Verified
Evidence has been checked against the agreed scope.
The process is designed to show what has been checked, what remains uncertain and who actually verified the human.
We agree what matters, what risk needs reducing, and what evidence is proportionate.
CV, documents, work samples, certification links, structured answers and relevant context are collected only for the agreed purpose.
Technology may help with workflow and consistency. Suitability judgement is not handed to a black box.
The output separates verified, partially verified, candidate-declared, unverified, conflicting and follow-up-required claims.
Employers get better evidence before interview. Candidates get fairer representation than a self-certified CV.
These labels are used on verification packs and sample outputs. They are not decorative badges; they tell the hiring team what can and cannot be relied on.
Evidence has been checked against the agreed scope.
Some evidence exists, but the claim is not fully closed.
The candidate has stated it, but it has not been independently checked.
No suitable evidence has been reviewed yet.
The reviewed evidence does not line up cleanly.
The hiring team should probe this before relying on it.
Verification reduces uncertainty. It does not guarantee future performance, cultural fit, formal clearance, statutory right-to-work status or the truth of any claim beyond the evidence actually reviewed.